> USER IDENT:
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 29, 2010, 09:56:57 PM

Login with username, password and session length
> NETWORK UPDATE
> KEY STATISTICS
153961 Posts in 4890 Topics by 1951 Members
Latest Member: XidiouX
* Home Help Search Profile members Calendar Login Register
+  Alien Experience Forum
|-+  Containment Labs
| |-+  Alien Franchise (Military Police: maledoro)
| | |-+  Should living Space Jockeys ever be depicted in on-screen canon/continuity?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Should living Space Jockeys ever be depicted in on-screen canon/continuity?  (Read 2959 times)
Pred Killer
*
PFC

Merits: -10014
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 194


Forum tard. Banned.


View Profile
Re: Should living Space Jockeys ever be depicted in on-screen canon/continuity?
« Reply #45 on: August 23, 2009, 07:06:26 PM »

LOL -- yep, one's imagination can always make for fantastical thoughts and perceptions regarding so many cinema characters, etc. -- and once they're explained in too much detail otherwise -- aka as in the lackluster backstories of Anakin Skywalker/Darth Vader and Boba Fett to name just a couple in Lucas's STAR WARS prequels -- it can completely strip away the wonder and intrigue of what made those characters so interesting to begin with.

I agree with many others here that if it is going to be done (which it looks like it will) -- that extreme care needs to be taken so as not to "de-mystify" the "Space Jockey" and its race.

- Jay  Facehugger in da face... For the last time!
Hopefully they can depict them without giving too much away.

Logged

Banned.
Pandorag
*
Captain
Canada

Merits: 307
Online Online

Gender: Female
Posts: 1,251


A little bad taste is like a nice dash of paprika.


View Profile
Re: Should living Space Jockeys ever be depicted in on-screen canon/continuity?
« Reply #46 on: August 23, 2009, 07:16:11 PM »

LOL -- yep, one's imagination can always make for fantastical thoughts and perceptions regarding so many cinema characters, etc. -- and once they're explained in too much detail otherwise -- aka as in the lackluster backstories of Anakin Skywalker/Darth Vader and Boba Fett to name just a couple in Lucas's STAR WARS prequels -- it can completely strip away the wonder and intrigue of what made those characters so interesting to begin with.

I agree with many others here that if it is going to be done (which it looks like it will) -- that extreme care needs to be taken so as not to "de-mystify" the "Space Jockey" and its race.

- Jay  Facehugger in da face... For the last time!



I usually try not to imagine too much so as to not be disapointed, it usually works well for me. For example, I keep the literature in one part of my brain, and the movies in another, classified in their own subcategories.

And you said it again, it looks like it will happen, and it's one aspect of the movie that was never exploited, so I am bracing myself.
Logged

"A little sincerity is a dangerous thing, and a great deal of it is absolutely fatal. "

Oscar Wilde
SM
W-Y Advisor
*
Lt. General
Meritorious Service Medal
Merits: 286
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 5,267


Sequel Art Fag


View Profile WWW
Re: Should living Space Jockeys ever be depicted in on-screen canon/continuity?
« Reply #47 on: August 23, 2009, 07:23:38 PM »

An inspection of the concept art done by H.R. Giger, shows that the "trunk" is supposed to be an air hose and there is a helmet surrounding the Jockey's head.






Has anyone seen this pic before?.

Have seen it.  Not sure if you're saying it's a Giger - cos it's not.

The closest we'd get to what a living Jockey looks like would be the heiroglyphs Giger actually did do - but the concept changed quite a bit to when the film was shot.
Logged
Sebastian
W-Y Special Ops
*
General
Sweden
Good Conduct MedalDistinguished Service Medal
Merits: 598
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 10,944



View Profile WWW
Re: Should living Space Jockeys ever be depicted in on-screen canon/continuity?
« Reply #48 on: August 23, 2009, 08:05:50 PM »

Yeah, it even says (©) David Blackwell at the bottom of it.
Logged



Necronom IV
*
Private
United Kingdom

Merits: 16
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 95


Where the sun burns cold and the wind blows colder


View Profile
Re: Should living Space Jockeys ever be depicted in on-screen canon/continuity?
« Reply #49 on: August 23, 2009, 09:41:38 PM »

Another problem I have with seeing the Space Jockeys, other than it ruining the disturbing mystery regarding their biology (or indeed perhaps lack of), is the fact that it'll take the series into the realms of mass-species intergalactic sci fi, ala Star Trek and Star Wars. No I'm not saying that'd make it childish or silly, I mean from the perspective that those franchises are based around lots of intelligent life going about space and doing their thing. A fun fantasy that totally contrasts with the total loneliness of us in our galaxy.

As someone said above, Alien's idea of space is that it's very, very empty. It's dark and dismal and "no one can hear you scream".

In the whole series we never saw another species of alien life (no I'm not regarding Predator spin-off rubbish with this). In Alien we get the impression they'd not seen alien life before, making the space jockey all the more bizarre and disturbing, whilst the xenomorphs themselves are literally something out of their worst nightmares. The derelict isn't just creepy because of it's design, it's a marvel due to their seeming disbelief that they've actually encountered an alien vessel (it may presumably not be the first time, but it certainly comes across that way, and to the viewer as well the first sight of it feels like we too are seeing an alien ship for the first time in our movie-watching lives, as if it were real).

In Aliens we admittedly get comments about "bug hunts", but never going into detail as to what that ever involved (indeed may very well have been very simple life forms). But Ripley's inquest again makes it seem all the more like alien life is effectively non-existent in their universe. Likewise Newt's father doesn't ever say it looks like a spaceship (ok, it's a weird looking one anyway, but I digress), and simply states "I don't know" when asked "what is it dad?" again implying a culture not expecting to ever encounter alien life.

In Alien3, Andrews acts with total disbelieving sarcasm to the whole idea of the xenomorph "it's an 8 foot creature of some kind, with acid for blood and it arrived on your spaceship?". Whilst Golic regards it as a dragon/deity, and disregarding his madness for a second, does suggest this is a future society that has had pretty much little to no experience with alien life of any kind before.

One of the things I do in fact cherrish about the Alien trilogy (and in thinking about this, makes me find another part of the AVP franchise I hate), is the fact that it reflects humanity as still very much like our own. A society that travels through space very, very slowly, that hasn't encountered any other (intelligent) life, that exist in the dull and dreary world we do today but merely set 200 years in the future. Space travel isn't fun, it's the black void they have to sleep through before they get to and from their bleak destinations. We're the only species flying around up there and space is just a place to work, full of emptiness and no surprises... making the discovery of the space jockey and xenomorph all the more terrifying and indeed "alien". Their experience with space exploration seemingly features an outer space not dissimilar to our solar-system; the odd Mars here and there, good for terraforming, but no intelligent life. And that's what makes it feel all the more real.

I'm not suggesting they'd treat the space jockey species with Star Trek simplicity, such as interacting and communicating with humans, but the very notion of bringing them to life physically not only takes away their creepy mystique but to me lessens the impact of discovering the xenomorph by showing an alien culture existing within this saga's universe that implies that space isn't as terrifyingly lonely as we had assumed. Even if they kill off the species, it's all too Transformers/Thundercats/Superman for my liking, and in the process of projecting that they'd likely have to anthropomorphisize them to tell an understandable narrative, which I really wouldn't want to see.
« Last Edit: August 23, 2009, 11:25:46 PM by Necronom IV » Logged

SM
W-Y Advisor
*
Lt. General
Meritorious Service Medal
Merits: 286
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 5,267


Sequel Art Fag


View Profile WWW
Re: Should living Space Jockeys ever be depicted in on-screen canon/continuity?
« Reply #50 on: August 23, 2009, 11:15:38 PM »

Quote
Yeah, it even says (©) David Blackwell at the bottom of it.

Kind of a giveaway.  Mr Green returns

Quote
A fun fantasy that totally contrasts with the total loneliness of us in our galaxy.

Giler and Hill were very against going down a multispecies Star Wars/ Trek route.  One version of the script had the Conrad quote about living and dying alone at the start.  Not sure if this was on pre-Giler/ Hill drafts or not.

I think that non-sentient lifeforms have been encountered on many occassions.  Sentient - not sure.  ECIU didn't have much trouble deciphering the Jockies signal, which one would think would be difficult without a point of reference.  I think the nonchalance of the crew would indicate that this wasn't first contact (in spite of early Star Beast drafts).
Logged
Pred Killer
*
PFC

Merits: -10014
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 194


Forum tard. Banned.


View Profile
Re: Should living Space Jockeys ever be depicted in on-screen canon/continuity?
« Reply #51 on: August 23, 2009, 11:28:07 PM »

Necro, I'd say the best bet is to (if they just can't resist putting the jocks in there), make them just as malevolent as the Xenomorphs. Make them psycho, like rip your goddamn throat out psycho. I don't see any reason for them not to, lol. They DID live around Xenos, they would have probably evolved to be very violent creatures themselves. To contain a nightmare you have to BE a nightmare. And if they have to show them, make them mysterious, like in the first film, like you barely get to see the creature itself it's always in the shadows. Give it that 'less is more' thing going on.
« Last Edit: August 23, 2009, 11:30:11 PM by Pred Killer » Logged

Banned.
deezelboy
W-Y CEO
*
General
United Kingdom
Outstanding Artist MedalMeritorious Service MedalJoint Service Commendation MedalGood Conduct MedalTechnical Service Medal
Merits: 603
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 7,897


Underachieving since 1972!


View Profile
Re: Should living Space Jockeys ever be depicted in on-screen canon/continuity?
« Reply #52 on: August 24, 2009, 05:00:48 AM »

One version of the script had the Conrad quote about living and dying alone at the start.  Not sure if this was on pre-Giler/ Hill drafts or not.

Think it was all Hill&Giler's doing.  They started dropping the Conrad references in there once they'd got Scott, I guess presuming he was a Conrad fan given The Duellists.  He wasn't!

Quote
ECIU didn't have much trouble deciphering the Jockies signal, which one would think would be difficult without a point of reference.

Might chalk that up to the Jockey's, though.  If the warning transmission was intended for other species, they'd want it to be as translatable as possible.

Although if the Jockeys were worried about other species finding the Derelict, it does suggest that there are other space-travelling species out there.
Logged

<a href="http://i64.photobucket.com/albums/h167/deezelboy/Flash/microDefenderv01.swf" target="_blank">http://i64.photobucket.com/albums/h167/deezelboy/Flash/microDefenderv01.swf</a>
SM
W-Y Advisor
*
Lt. General
Meritorious Service Medal
Merits: 286
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 5,267


Sequel Art Fag


View Profile WWW
Re: Should living Space Jockeys ever be depicted in on-screen canon/continuity?
« Reply #53 on: August 24, 2009, 07:34:46 PM »

Good point and good point.
Logged
JamesCameronOnline
*
Corporal

Merits: 26
Offline Offline

Posts: 221



View Profile WWW
Re: Should living Space Jockeys ever be depicted in on-screen canon/continuity?
« Reply #54 on: December 05, 2009, 04:41:15 PM »

I thought this one was the most plausible depiction



« Last Edit: December 05, 2009, 07:07:32 PM by JamesCameronOnline » Logged

SM
W-Y Advisor
*
Lt. General
Meritorious Service Medal
Merits: 286
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 5,267


Sequel Art Fag


View Profile WWW
Re: Should living Space Jockeys ever be depicted in on-screen canon/continuity?
« Reply #55 on: December 06, 2009, 08:17:04 PM »

Horrible fat hippy...
Logged
JamesCameronOnline
*
Corporal

Merits: 26
Offline Offline

Posts: 221



View Profile WWW
Re: Should living Space Jockeys ever be depicted in on-screen canon/continuity?
« Reply #56 on: December 06, 2009, 08:57:22 PM »

Horrible fat hippy...

Lol, with the exception of Blackwell's drawing, I think it still beats the other versions
Logged

Nev
W-Y Advisor
*
Brig. General
Finland
Good Conduct Medal
Merits: 499
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 2,922


Ayatollah of Rock'n'Rollah


View Profile
Re: Should living Space Jockeys ever be depicted in on-screen canon/continuity?
« Reply #57 on: December 06, 2009, 08:59:57 PM »


That could aswell be Giger's, considering what the egg resembles in the lower picture. Mr Green returns
Logged

Pandorag
*
Captain
Canada

Merits: 307
Online Online

Gender: Female
Posts: 1,251


A little bad taste is like a nice dash of paprika.


View Profile
Re: Should living Space Jockeys ever be depicted in on-screen canon/continuity?
« Reply #58 on: December 06, 2009, 09:09:05 PM »

That could aswell be Giger's, considering what the egg resembles in the lower picture. Mr Green returns

Gosh darn it, that was hard to refrain myself from writing what it looks like.  Mr Green returns
Logged

"A little sincerity is a dangerous thing, and a great deal of it is absolutely fatal. "

Oscar Wilde
LargeLeader
W-Y Advisor
*
Lt. Colonel
United Kingdom

Merits: 294
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1,956


A contradictory farce.


View Profile
Re: Should living Space Jockeys ever be depicted in on-screen canon/continuity?
« Reply #59 on: December 06, 2009, 10:22:08 PM »

That's a nasty hernia he's got there.
Logged

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.1 | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.104 seconds with 49 queries.