> USER IDENT:
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2013, 05:53:43 AM

Login with username, password and session length
> NETWORK UPDATE
> KEY STATISTICS
176328 Posts in 5655 Topics by 10829 Members
Latest Member: George McMahon
* Home Help Search Profile members Calendar Login Register
+  Alien Experience Forum
|-+  Containment Labs
| |-+  Alien Franchise (Military Police: maledoro)
| | |-+  Facehugger vs. Artificial
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Facehugger vs. Artificial  (Read 542 times)
Company Man
Guest
Space Jockey

A derelict post from a vanished civillisation
Facehugger vs. Artificial
« on: March 23, 2012, 06:35:29 AM »

Something I always wondered. Would a facehugger be so inclined to attack a synthetic, er cybor... uh, artificial person.

Would it not know the difference? Even if did or didn't would it still attempt to attach and implant? Could it take?

Just something different to think about.
Logged
Hieronymus
W-Y Enforcer
*
2nd Lieutenant
United States
Meritorious Service Medal
Merits: 130
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 689


Bioweapon specialist


View Profile
Re: Facehugger vs. Artificial
« Reply #1 on: March 25, 2012, 01:41:41 PM »

We have no idea what kind of sensory organs facehuggers have, so it's hard to say what they interpret as prey.

We know that Kane was attacked while wearing a space suit.  That helps us tease the situation apart.  Short answer: the senses that a facehugger could use to detect someone in a space suit should detect an android, and the senses that could be used to distinguish an android from meat might be blocked by a space suit anyway.  So if the facehugger attacked Kane, it would probably have attacked Ash.

Kane would have been thermally insulated, so the facehugger might not have seen his body heat (although it might have detected heat from an externally-mounted power supply or something).  Likewise, it wouldn't have smelled his breath, or pheromones, or anything like that.

That probably leaves motion.  Even without eyes, facehuggers and eggs should be able to detect vibration through the ground, and facehuggers may even have a form of echolocation.  That would pick up an android or a human equally well.

Finally, there is the possibility of some kind of electrosensory organ similar to the ampullae of Lorenzini on a shark, which could pick up the electrical field of a living thing (the efficiency of such organs drops drastically outside of saltwater, but we're talking about a species that does six impossible things before breakfast here).  Depending on whether there was any kind of radiation shielding built into Kane's suit, the facehugger might or might not have been able to use such a sense to detect him.  Androids would presumably put off an electric field as well, but for different reasons.
Logged

"The experiment requires that you continue."
SM
W-Y Advisor
*
General
Meritorious Service MedalGood Conduct Medal
Merits: 395
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 6,365


Sequel Art Fag


View Profile WWW
Re: Facehugger vs. Artificial
« Reply #2 on: March 25, 2012, 05:28:39 PM »

There's a deleted scene form Aliens where Bishop is very close to the Aliens while he's in the pipe, yet is pretty much ignored.

Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.1 | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.112 seconds with 25 queries.